Table of Contents
- Abstract
- Introduction to North African Literature
- Evolution of Moroccan Literary Works
- Review of Literature
-
Brief Biography of Tahar Ben
Jelloun
- Theoretical Framework
- Critical Analysis of This Blinding Absence of Light
- Monarchy and Politics of Detention in This Blinding Absence of Light
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
Citation: Abdullahi Dahiru Umar & Nuhu Lawan (2024). Monarchy and Politics of Detention in Taher Ben Jalloun's “This Blinding Absence of Light”. Glob Acad J Linguist Lit; Vol-6, Iss-1 pp-25-39.
Monarchy
and Politics of Detention in Taher Ben Jalloun's
“This Blinding Absence of Light
”
By
Abdullahi
Dahiru Umar
Department
of English and Literature
Faculty
of Humanities
Federal
University Gusau
Nuhu
Lawan
Department
of English and Literature
Faculty
of Humanities
Federal
University Gusau
Abstract
Tahar Ben Jelloun's novels are
distinguished by their integration of problematic social phenomena into a
purely literary form. While this isn't unique to Ben Jelloun's writing style,
the author's way of crafting thought-provoking and often revolutionary experimental
stories from the material of traditional Moroccan life is, at least in a way
extraordinary: his characters experience social difficulties and embarrassments
in their lives through the metaphor of a fictional existence of their
self-perception. Thus, for example, their search for identity in their social
context manifests in their search for self-perception as fictional characters
and power struggles in relationships. Their relationship takes the form of a
battle for control of the story. Political prisoners associate writing with
their quest for freedom. This article therefore focuses on the torture, body
and voice representations of Taher Ben Jelloun's This Blinding Absence of Light
(2002). Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theory will be used to approach the
psychological disintegration of characters in the text following such a Dark
Decade experience and will borrow eclectic concepts from interdisciplinary
studies; Erving's concept of Goffman's "holistic institution", Elaine
Scarry's comprehensive and detailed theoretical definition and analysis of
torture, and Judith Herman's study of trauma.
Key
words: North Africa, Maghrebe, Baber,
Morrocan, Darija, Fusha.
Introduction to North African Literature
North African literature has
undergone significant evolution, shaped by the diverse traditions and
experiences of the countries constituting the region. This literary landscape,
inclusive of works from the Middle East, reflects a synthesis of cultural, linguistic,
and religious elements. Anissa Talahite aptly notes that North African
literature offers a perspective that aligns it with Arabic literature,
particularly that of the Middle East. Comprising the literary output of
countries such as Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, and Sudan, North
African literature is characterized by a shared ethnic, cultural, linguistic,
and Islamic identity, setting it apart from other African regions.
Among North African countries, Sudan
stands out as particularly unique. As articulated by Mazurui, Sudan is regarded
as both an African and Arab country, the latter designation primarily cultural
rather than genetic. The colonial legacy, notably French occupation in Algeria,
Morocco, and Tunisia, has significantly influenced North African literature,
shaping its thematic and stylistic contours.
The ancient Middle East boasts a
rich cultural tapestry, with Egypt occupying a prominent position owing to its
illustrious history spanning millennia. Situated along the Nile River, Egypt's
strategic geographic location, buffered by expansive deserts, has shielded it
from many external conflicts. The enduring legacy of ancient Egyptian
civilization is evident in monumental achievements such as the construction of
the pyramids, which serve not only as tombs but also as repositories of ancient
literature.
However, interactions among ancient
civilizations were often marred by conflict, with wars resulting in the
destruction or subjugation of entire populations and their cultural heritage.
Despite such upheavals, the Egyptian civilization persevered, owing to its
resilience and adaptability. The profound religious worldview of ancient
Egyptians, centered on the concept of an afterlife, profoundly influenced their
culture and artistic expression, as evidenced by the meticulous preparation for
the journey beyond death. The
influence of Egyptian culture extended beyond its borders, as evidenced by the
challenges faced by poets like Ahmad Zaki Abu Shadi in disseminating their
works across linguistic and regional boundaries. The intersection of diverse
cultures in North Africa, facilitated by advancements such as the printing
press, underscores the interconnectedness and complexity of the region's
literary landscape.
Yet, despite the geographical
proximity of North African countries and their shared cultural heritage, the
academic and media portrayal often fails to encapsulate the region in its
entirety. Orientalist perspectives, as articulated by Said, have further perpetuated
this division, relegating North African states to the "East" and
underscoring the enduring legacy of colonialism in shaping perceptions of the
region.
Evolution of Moroccan Literary Works
Morocco's complex multilingual scene
predated French and Spanish colonialism (1912-1956) as languages such as Darija
or spoken Moroccan Arabic, Fusha or standard Arabic and various spoken dialects
of Amazigh, as well as Judeo-Arabic and Judeo-Spanish, shaped the oral and
written cultures of Morocco. The arrival of French and Spanish languages
further complicated the picture, particularly as the French pursued a colonial
policy of imposing French as the sole language of education and administration.
The Moroccan State's ambiguous politics of Arabisation in the aftermath of
independence in 1956 did not succeed in removing French from the public sphere
as it remains the language of higher education and administration and is spoken
widely in Morocco's central cities such as Rabat and Casablanca.
Decades after national independence
in 1956 and Arabization, French is still widely spoken. There is a "daily
experience" of how Moroccans live in language 1 through how they
transition from Darija to Amazigh and read and write French, Arabic and
Spanish. This is not unique to Morocco as several African countries as well as
countries in the Arabic-speaking region share this linguistic diversity. What
we find in Morocco is what Abdelfattah Kilito (2013) calls a "divisive
language" (lisan maflouq) and a "divisive literature" (adab
maflouq). Today there are two literary systems in Morocco, one written in
French and the other in Arabic, and both aimed at two different audiences (the
French-speaking world and the French-speaking world). speak Arabic). The study
of Moroccan literature focuses on texts written in French or literature written
in Arabic and this is not the case only in the faculties of Arabic studies and
the faculties of French studies in Europe and North America but also in Morocco
itself, where researchers do not link the two production areas together.
While some Moroccan writers write
only in French or Arabic, there are others like Abdallah Laroui who writes
philosophical and critical texts in French and novels in Arabic. This was
because Laroui realized that his critical and philosophical texts would be
overlooked in Arabic-speaking Mashreq or the Middle East but appreciated by
Europeans. It was the European interest in Laroui's critical texts that always
aroused Mashreq's interest in his ideas (this happened with his book
Contemporary Arab Ideology (1967). The Arabic literary and critical works that
have been published in the last hundred years throughout the West in the world
feel that their works are known to them only through the way they are received
in Europe. Europe; for example, if an Arabic critical book was translated into
French and English it would be of importance in the Arabic-speaking region and
not before. Laroui asserts that: "all contact between us – North African,
Arab or Muslim – goes through the West…" (Kilito, 2013, P. 42). There is a
kind of implicit need for recognition that permeates the West.
The Moroccan novel in Arabic
occupies a very marginal place in the Arabic literary tradition. Most, if not
all, literary and historical anthologies of Arabic fiction are
Mashreqi-centered (or rather Egyptian-centered), as most of them consider the
literary tradition of Modern and pre-modern (and Maghrebi) Moroccan studies to
be insignificant. Roger Allen, one of the pioneering critics of Arabic
literature, recently acknowledged the limitations of the hegemonic regional
literary system, which is monopolistic and does not pay attention to
particularities (khususiya) of different genres in different contexts (Allen,
2007, P. 249).
Gonzalo Fernández Parrilla (2006)
demonstrates in his excellent book the literary history of the Moroccan novel
in Arabic and its close connection with the pre-modern traditions and genres of
Morocco as travel writing, manuscripts and letters. Neither Parrilla nor Allen
refers to the Moroccan novel in French and its close connection with its sister
novel in Arabic or with pre- and modern Moroccan traditions, again a sign of
excluding these analyses and readings based on nationalist and regional
languages of Moroccan literary tradition.
The Moroccan novel in French is read
with other Francophone texts within the French literary system to which it
remains marginal. This novel was largely directed in its early phases to a
French readership that was well-versed in colonial French literature like that
of Pierre Loti and others whose representation of Moroccans is marked by a set
of fixed stereotypes and prejudice (Kilito 2013, 69). This can explain the trap
of folklorisation and self-orientalising tendencies of the early Moroccan novel
in French that were challenged by later novelists like Abdellatif Laabi who
reinvented the Moroccan novel in French the Moroccan novel in Arabic and French
as a "roman-itinéraire" heavily influenced by Morocco's pre-modern
narrative traditions such as written travel literature (rihla) and its oral
equivalent al-maqamat (Wolf, 1992, P. 36).
Laabi who was the co-founder of the
Souffles/Anfas bilingual French/Arabic review is one of the Moroccan writers in
post-independent Morocco in the 1960s to emphasise the importance of reading
together Moroccan literature in Arabic and French. The journal resisted
state-imposed monoculturalism on the one hand and French colonial and cultural
hegemony on the other hand.4 Souffles's project to heal the divide between
intellectuals and writers in French and Arabic and create a debate between them
came to an end in 1972 when it was shut down by the regime for political
reasons. It seems that Moroccan critics in the post-independence period have
become more aware of the dangers of linguistic determinism and discrimination
in the analysis of Moroccan fiction in Arabic and French. Khatibi's book, Le
Roman maghrébin (1968), was one of the first examples of literary history going
beyond linguistic determinism by including Moroccan novels in Arabic and
French. The Arabic translation of the book by Mohammed Berrada in 1971
demonstrates the belief that the Moroccan novel must be read and analyzed
beyond linguistic divisions.
Chraibi's Le passé simple and
Choukri's Al Khubz Al hafi give us a complex set of aesthetics and
politics. Both novels explore Moroccan society and politics on the eve of
independence, and both provoked a wave of outcry upon publication: Chraibi's
novel is about views deemed anti-national at a pivotal time in the
anti-colonial movement and Choukri's for allegedly devaluing Moroccan culture
and its vulgarity. The joint analysis of the texts gives us a complex picture
of the national tensions in 1950s Morocco and highlights the divisions in the
anti-colonial movements among the different divisions; it also provides us with
a unique comparative context between the two systems of colonial rule, the
Spanish system in the North, where Choukri's text is located and is rarely
explored in Moroccan novels. The two authors explore the role of the
intelligentsia at this particular moment in Moroccan history, its relationship
to politics, and the formation of national consciousness.
It seems that Chraibi and Choukri
criticized not only colonial oppression but also the elitism of some members of
the anti-colonial nationalist movement. The political complexity of Chraibi and
Choukri as well as their critique of the violence of hegemony, patriarchy,
class, and social hierarchy is reflected in their aesthetics: Personal stories
and stories were deeply ingrained in national history and broader global
anti-colonial movements in the time (Algeria war, Palestinian struggle). Their
style de-sacred French and Arabic and marked them with a Moroccan cultural
identity.
What would an entangled reading of
Abdellatif Laabi's l'oeil et la nuit (1969) and Mohamed Berrada's Lu'bat
Anisyan (1986) tell us about the intertwined styles of these two giants of
Moroccan literature? Both works reveal moments of aesthetic creativity in the
literary history of the Moroccan novel, such as Laabi's novel which sets itself
apart from the first self-directed Moroccan novel. in French and Berrada's
experimental writing style, which left him with his first Arab nationalist
novel. Both writers have a firm belief in the multilingualism of Moroccan
literature and how they engage in translation from Arabic to French and from
French to Arabic to establish meaningful dialogue significance not only among
Moroccan literary producers but also with Mashreqi and European traditions.
Both writers' novels challenge entrenched traditions (literary and cultural)
and offer a synthetic critique of state power using their creative and
aesthetic narrative styles.
If Moroccan literature in French is
the result of historical and colonial circumstances, then it can be said that
Moroccan literature in English is essentially the voice of cultural openness
and liberation. English for Moroccan writers is a linguistic vehicle for
reaching others thanks to its universality and global power. It should be
noted, however, that the impact of the original Moroccan creation written in
English is still limited to the Moroccan cultural and literary context. This
can be explained by the fact that on the Moroccan language map, English is only
the fourth language spoken in the country after Berber and Arabic.
Finding the entirety of Moroccan
literature in English is difficult not because of its quantity but because of
its rarity. Add to that the absence of any previous bibliographic work on the
subject and the difficulty of finding individual publications in small, unknown
local journalists or publications. beyond the reach of the Moroccan diaspora in
English-speaking countries. In Jacqueline Jondot's doctoral thesis, titled
"English-Speaking Writers of the Arab Middle East," the only North
African writers the author can refer to in this massive work (1,400 pages) are
Moroccans Anouar Majid and Fatéma Mernissi and Tunisian La Sabiha Khemir in an
understandable misunderstanding of some of the Moroccan creative writings in
English.
The 1990s saw the first publication
of novels in English by Moroccan authors. One of the frequent features of this
literature is autobiographical nostalgia for lost Moroccan values and
childhoods. This nostalgia permeates the poetry of Abu-Talib and Saber but also
permeates the novels of Anouar Majid, Abdellatif Akbib and Jilali El-Koudia
differently and more indirectly. In the novel Si Youssef (London: Quartet
Books, 1992), Anouar Majid creates a vivid picture of life in Tangier. He
creates compelling Tanjawi characters that reflect Moroccan social life while
inviting "readers to question fixed definitions of identity and to take a
journey towards diversity and pluralism." Through Lamin, a student at Fez
University, the story conveys a heartfelt sense of youth, reflecting the
biographical and social experiences of Tangier, Majid's hometown.
Abdellatif Akbib, also from Tangier,
draws material for his literary works from Tangier and Tanjawi societies. Its
stories are set in and around Tangier and its protagonists depict a social life
completely immersed in the local culture of northern Morocco. In Graffiti
(1997) and Between the Lines (1998), Akbib develops several themes related to
individuals struggling to cope with problems complicated by complex social
structures, relationships difficult family relationships and the corrupt
political situations imposed upon them. For Kiessling, Hearts of Embers is
Akbib's best work. The writing style is more authoritative than previous short
stories. The level of writing is always at a high level from start to finish.
Laila Lalami, who lives in the
United States, has published two successful novels that completely deal with
her Moroccan education and culture. Hope and Other Dangerous Pursuits (Chapel
Hill, NC: Algonquin Books, 2005) recounts the illegal journey of four Moroccans
across the Strait of Gibraltar on a rubber boat to Spain; the author reveals
the lives of the main characters, giving a vivid image of modern post-colonial
Morocco, where the dreams and hopes of the young generation are dashed by
unemployment, poverty and suppress. Lalami's second novel, The Secret Son
(Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Book: 2009) has been hailed as "an insightful
story about the intricacies of life in contemporary Morocco".
Jilali El Koudia draws inspiration
from Moroccan Islamic traditions and popular stories for her literary work.
Winner of the first prize of the Moroccan Writers Council in 2000 in English
(novel), El Koudia is a famous short story writer and translator of many works
of Moroccan literature. In Moroccan folklore (Fez, 1999, P. 189), he was
inspired by popular stories he heard as a child with the women in his family.
As stated in the introduction, El Koudia not only transcribed the 31 stories he
heard but also rewrote, recreated and retold them, removing verbs and
repetitions. His stories Under the Sun deal with a variety of themes depicting
different aspects of Moroccan culture and portraying rural life in its vibrant
but sometimes brutal reality.
For many English-speaking Moroccan
writers, however, Marrakech is the setting for Hassan Zrizi's Jomana
(Marrakesh: Nada-Com, 2006, P.208) and Return to Bahja (Marrakesh: Nada-Com,
2010, P. 156). Both novels take place in Jama'a L'Fna, Marrakech's famous
public square. The open square allows the author to draw a parallel between the
novelist and the public narrator as artists who rely on oral and written texts
to communicate with their audiences. Her novels dramatize the plight of
Moroccan women and their plight in a conservative society.
The number of poetry anthologies
published by Moroccan writers is very limited, and there are only a few volumes
with poems scattered in magazines or anthologies. The late Professor Mohammed
Abu-Talib (1930-2000) was the first Moroccan to publish a book of poetry in
English. Angry Whisper (London and New York: Regency Press, 1970) reflects the
author's indignation at the overwhelming encroachment of Western culture at the
expense of Moroccan and North African values. For example, in "Beverage to
the Prophet" (p. 14), he wonders why European Christians order soft drinks
at a Moroccan party while Moroccans order alcoholic drinks:
Whisky alone –
no ice,' the Muslim ordered.
The Christian
neighbour looked and pondered:
An Oulmès for
me – doctor's orders,
'The rest
gives nothing but stomach ulcers.'
[…]
Gin-tonic!'
another fasting believer.
Coca-cola!'
another rotten Kafer.
It uses plain Standard English, with
no attempt to "Morocco" the wording or content.
Following in the footsteps of Abou
Talib, his guide and mentor, Voices From
Underground by Ahmed Saber (Fez: Info-Print, 2004, P. 211) protects the
cultural and religious values of the Moroccan tradition. Poems such as
"Notre M'kaddem" and "Bassrism" address human rights issues
in Morocco in a direct and scathing commentary on human rights abuses under
Basri, the former interior minister. of the late King Hassan II. To highlight
her Moroccan cultural identity, Saber does not hesitate to include Arabic terms
in her poems without offering a glossary to foreign readers.
Ahmed Radi's Ephemeral Fragments:
Poetry in English in a Moroccan Context (Marrakesh: Imprimerie Al Watania, 1998,
P. 134) is a testament to the scepticism and anxiety of Moroccan poets when
writing in English. In the dilemma of using one language, Radi went so far as
to include poems in Arabic in his English poetry collection. Radi's poetry
deals with a variety of themes, including autobiographical flashbacks of
loneliness, exile, and loneliness. For example, in the poem Silence, the author
captures the "mystical" and "pure" silence of the deserted
streets of Marrakech at Ramadan breakfast time to convey feelings of loneliness
and loneliness.
Khalid Chaouch, poet and literary
critic, published Humble Odysseys, A Play
in Five Acts (Fedala: Mohammedia, 2002, P. 133), to my knowledge, this is
the only published play written in English by a Moroccan playwright. The play,
which deals with migration, won the author the British Council's Prize for
Moroccan Writers in English (Drama). Her poetry anthology Deaf Rhythm has been
described by Cherki Karkaba as weaving "the thread of a subtle cultural
dialogue concerning East and West".
Review of Literature
According to Kharmach, the
beginnings of literary criticism in Morocco were modest attempts to praise
literary works. These incitements are taqrı̄ẓāt or taḥliyāt, eulogy in prose
and poetry praising a literary work or a writer. In "Taṭawūr al-Naqd al-Adabī
al-Ḥadīth bi al-Maghribī" (2009), the critic Akkar describes these
celebratory comments as impressions and praises the "virtue" of the
"virtue's authors". Serious works inspired by contemporary literary
tastes. Kharmach cites Al-I'lām bi Man Ḥalla Murrākash wa Aghmāt min
al-A'lām (1936) by Abbas ben Brahim el Marrakechi as an excellent work on taqrı̄ẓāt
and taḥliyāt. It is highly valued and appreciated by literary lovers. For
example, Taie ben Driss el Kadiri considers Al-I'lām a "masterpiece"
of what El Marrakech wrote in literature and history with an unusually
easy-to-understand writing style up to literary criticism. To him, these are
just congratulatory messages to praise literary works. In addition to these
compliments, Kharmach considers the conversations that take place among
literary enthusiasts as the first "critical" motivators.
Citing Mokhtar Soussi, Kharmach
observes that before the protectorate, meetings or "criticism" salons
were held in a Soussi literary society. Poetic works were presented to them and
they regarded them with approval or disapproval, but with the utmost courtesy.
But Soussi's Al-Ma'sūl makes no mention of any of the "critical"
claims or standards that pubs use to measure literary merit. In this regard,
leading Moroccan critic Ahmad El Yabouri discredited Al-Ma'sūl by calling it
insufficient evidence. In "Al-Naqd al-Adabī fī al-Maghrib" (2009), he
considers Al-Ma'sūl as an example of historical works that create a
"disabled history" of Moroccan literature because they do not relate
to literature but only interested in literature about leading statesmen and
writers living in several urban centres.
Kharmach explained that the growing
impetus for these nascent criticisms was due to the growing press at the time,
specifically the Rabat-based al-Sa'ādah newspaper. Its 752nd issue, for
example, includes a "jury verdict" bringing El Kabbaj's poetry
against Nemichi. There is strength and eloquence in El Kabbaj's poetry as well
as sweetness and tenderness in Ahmed Nemichi's poetry. Without any support,
Kharmach argues that this contrast must be based on "research", which
heralds a near-dawn criticism. In the 2056 issue, Mohamed Boujandar recalls
literary works of the late 1910s, emphasizing that "there is a lot of
theatricality: Many writers tend to embellish the term regardless of its
intended meaning and envelop it with various decorations and allusions. For
Kharmach, Boujandar was one of the "first letter writers" that
attracted Moroccan writers, who indulged in linguistic embellishments, to
ensure a balance between word and meaning: Clear style and reader-friendly
semantics. Such a call may have been previously unknown or ignored. In a
nutshell, Kharmach seeks to deepen the embryonic "critical" activity
which began to move away from cliché and vague praise towards the threshold of
"emerging" criticism in the 1920s and 1930s. It was a larger context
that helped shape the emerging criticisms of the 1920s and 1930s.
Kharmach provides insight into two
important events in Moroccan history. The first was the Berber Dahir (edict) of
16 May 1930. It was designed by the French protectorate to establish customary
courts for the Amazighs; this was seen by the nationalist movement as an evil
attempt to abolish Islamic law among the Amazighs and eventually convert them
to Christianity. Second, proceed to non-military resistance. This led to the
creation of Kutlat al-'Amal al-Waṭanı̄ (Morocco Action Committee) in 1934. In
this anti-colonial context, nationalists sought to use culture and ideology as
tools to combat colonialism and awaken people. To this end, they designed a
cultural "army" that included nationalist newspapers and magazines,
theatre performances, cultural fairs, public debates, and more. explore and
study history and literature to highlight the Moroccan identity. Inextricably
linked with anti-colonial politics, literature has come to prominence: poetry
was absorbed by national fervour; efforts have been made to write novels and
plays; socio-historical essays flourished; and works of art and criticism began
to take root. In addition, newspapers and magazines created to engage and
enlighten the masses, including al-Ḥayāt and al-Ḥuriyah in Tetouan, al-Taqqadum
in Salé and al-Aṭlas in Rabat, do not forget al-Salām and al- Magazine Maghrib
al-Jadı̄d in Tetouan and al-Maghrib, Risālat al-Maghrib and al-Thaqāfah
al-Jadı̄dah in Rabat. Thus, writers no longer keep their works in cabinets but
inform a wider audience. Quoting Gennoun's Aḥādı̄th fı̄ al-Adab al-Maghribı̄
al-Ḥadı̄th (1964) by Gennoun, Kharmach mentions that writers become very
conscious of what they are writing for fear of being discredited by criticism,
due to that the number of self-proclaimed writers infiltrating literature is
decreasing.
The broad academic consensus
indicates that Moroccan literary criticism dates back to the 1920s and 1930s.
Akkar argues that the 1920s saw the dawn of literary criticism in the form of
musāmarāt. He described them as lectures given by educated French and Moroccan
men at literary parlours and high schools, which addressed both literary and
non-literary issues. As examples of talks that were later turned into books,
Akkar cites Musāmarat al-Shi'r wa al-Shu'arā' (1928) by Abdellah el Kabbaj and
Tārı̄kh al-Shi'r wa al- Shu'arā'bi by Ahmed Nemichi. France (1928). Like Akkar,
El Yabouri asserts that literary criticism dates back to the 1930s. Its
"modest" beginnings are marked by history and biography, and it
merely "releases" from its "historical burden."
history" than when he was influenced by literary values with roots in
Eastern Arabia. Mohamed Daghmoumi reveals that this cultural contact is very
evident between Moroccan writers, who have observed, inspired, disseminated and
praised Eastern literature and its authors. In "Qaḍāyā wa Nuṣūṣ min
al-Naqd al-Maghribī" (2002), Abdelfattah Lahjomri, like El Yabouri,
extended the birth of criticism until the 1930s, when critics attempted to
establish a style literary movement whose socio-cultural space is shaped by
literary influences. Opinions and values come from both Eastern Arabia and
Western Europe. This cultural exposure to the East and the West influenced the
literary and critical works of the 1930s, but there is a distinct Moroccan
element in the work of these emerging critics. In agreement with El Yabouri and
Lahjomri, Daghmoumi traces the "true roots" of literary criticism to
the 1930s, a decade marked by the crystallization of nationalist sentiments,
especially in Morocco's urban centre. Citing Ziyad and Guennoun, Daghmoumi
argues that business is important to have been "organically"
integrated into the nationalist movement: it was an integral part of the
anti-colonial struggle, and its effectiveness and influence were no less than that
of politics.
Indeed, it sought to espouse and
express nationalist values and voices that bore the signs of an emergent
"cultural identity." It is this nascent criticism that Kharmach
attempts to investigate and illustrate through a body of "critical"
excerpts entitled "Al-Shi'r wa al-Shu'rā'." In it, El Kabbaj remarks
that, besides connecting writers and celebrating sovereigns, poetry teaches and
cultivates a "sophisticated taste. Not akin to "dry" prose,
poetry is lively: it evokes deeper emotions and inspires inner selves; it is an
inborn gift which is written in an eloquent and soft language as well as an
elegant and smooth style, drawing on imagery, metaphor and simile. For El
Kabbaj, poets should be emotionally deeper and imaginatively richer, so they
can betray and convey what they experience.32 "Promising" as this
major talk or text may seem, el Kabbaj's look at poetry by his contemporaries
did not yet abandon laudatory language or ascend what Kharmach depicts as
"the throne of criticism."
Another conventional but influential
name is Mohamed ben Abbas El Kabbaj, the eminent writer of Al-Adab al-'Arabı̄
fı̄ al-Maghrib al-Aqṣá (1929). For El Yabouri, El Kabbaj's book is a central
contribution to writing the history of Moroccan literature, one which reveals
the impact of Egyptian literary trends on this generation of Moroccan writers.
For Akkar, El Kabbaj's work is the "amplest embodiment" of a growing
movement that sought to anthologize writers and writings. In "Breaking the
Canon," Fernández Parrilla, a chief Spanish Arabist, considers El Kabbaj's
milestone anthology a "pioneer contribution of modern literary
criticism" Still, it extends beyond anthologizing Moroccan writers to
bringing a burgeoning literary identity to the foreground. For Kharmach, El
Kabbaj's Al-Adab al-'Arabı̄ highlights the crucial features of Moroccan
literature in Arabic with "clear views" about literature and writers
and the "critical views" held by those writers. Aware of literary
movements in the Arab world and the evolution of literary works there, El
Kabbaj groups writers into leading, inter-generational and budding, cautioning
against anachronistic readings of literature and commenting that criticism
should address the history and milieu where the works of each group arise. He
advises "critics" to advance approaches that ensure objectivity in
comprehension and accuracy in judgment, calling upon the most acquainted among
them to identify and remedy shortcomings in literary writing and thought.
Kharmach, however, reveals that the
1920s and 1930s literary devotees advanced views about literary writings, not
theoretical theories: they thought highly of taste as essential to appreciating
and approaching literature; they thought circumstantially of how history and
society shape literature; and they thought of critics as having to be
culturally competent, intellectually disposed and accurately articulate.
Indeed, some like Mokhtar Soussi and Mohamed El Mekki Naciri have gone further
by encouraging writers to advance national and human causes beyond literature.
For them, writers must engage in living reality and express human beliefs,
feelings, and hopes. These calls to participation, inspired by the
circumstances, seem to be the "whispers" of the Marxist-realist
criticisms of the 1970s.
The 1940s and mid-1950s were marked
by a major step forward in the development of important business in Morocco.
Indeed, debates, opinions, and studies focused on literary and critical
contexts have multiplied. One of the most heated debates concerns the
usefulness of literature. According to Kharmach, there are two movements"
that offer two different points of view: an artistic value for art and an
artistic value for life. In "Al-Insān wa al-Adab" (1949), author and
historian Mohammed Zniber observes that literature attracts the human spirit
because it reflects beauty whose most sought-after attributes are eternity and
truth.86 For him, to "design" a literary work that reveals beauty, a
writer must create a "coherent whole" capable of reconciling
opposites: intelligence and emotions, logic and whims, reflection and
improvisation. Above all, it is the writer's "genius" and
"taste" which "meticulously" mix the seeming opposites to
create aesthetic appeal.
Another aesthetic advocate is
Mouhamed El Bouanani. Unlike Zniber, El Bouanani highlights freedom as an
aesthetic value intrinsic to literature. In "Kayfa Nurīd al-Adīb
al-Fanān" (1951), he describes literature as one of the "finest"
and "freest" arts whose supremacy stems from its self-sufficiency; it
is an end in itself free from life's entanglements, and once it surrenders its
freedom to morally or socially motivated ends, literature loses its
"beauty" and "delight."88 For him, the aesthetic writer,
who holds "the most supreme torch," ought to mingle with all walks of
life to hone instincts, refine selves and polish feelings, thus serving as a
force for good, beauty and virtue.89 In short, among other "l'art pour
l'art" voices whom Kharmach considers, Zniber and El Bouanani argue that
literature improves taste, evokes emotion and describes beauty − be it inner or
outer, and it is "incidental" or even "abusive" to orient
literature elsewhere.
Furthermore, there were attempts at
studying drama and fiction which were growing and inviting genres in the 1940s
and 1950s. According to Daghmoumi, these efforts are "modest" and do
not constitute a substantial undertaking of compelling scale and depth. For
example, in Al-Shi'r al-Tamthīlī wa al-Qaṣaṣī wa al-Ādāb al-'Arabiyah (1941),
Taher Zniber, for example, calls on Arab writers to participate in drama
production even though he is not was a native of classical Arabic literature.
Zniber attributes the failure of Arab writers to appear in drama to an
inability or "impatience" to adhere to playwriting standards and
create genre-specific characters and themes. He invited Arab writers to embrace
this non-native genre by setting three conditions for writing. First, a play,
written or performed, must be of "pure" Arab origin because it is
designed to appeal to an Arab audience. Then, its theme and theme must be
inspired by Arab history, which boasts landmark events that appeal to the understanding,
interests and feelings of the audience. Ultimately, the costumes and furniture
used in this "localized" film must reflect the era it represents.
In short, Zniber calls for the
integration of theatre into Arabic literature in a way rooted in Arab history
and culture. Contrary to Zniber's invitation to localize theatre, Abdeslam
Alaoui urges writers to embrace and emulate the great play, even as it comes
out in the West. In "Corneille" (1941), Alaoui introduces the
17th-century French playwright to Moroccan readers, emphasizing moral values.
Corneille's play teaches "the greatness of the self and the solidity of
morality"; it emphasizes self-control and strong will, guided by an
inquiring mind and independent of whims. Alaoui invites readers and writers to
explore Corneille's dramatic teachings as they offer a "strong moral"
that deserves to be inculcated.
While the above critics and
enthusiasts attempt to approach Moroccan, Arabic and Western literary works,
others undertake the exploration of what literary criticism means, its
background, its goals and objectives purpose and its implementation. In "Da'āmat
al-Naqd: Al-Baḥth 'an al-Ḥaq wa al-Jamāl" (1943), the screenwriter
Mustapha El Gharbaoui described the criticism as an "extremely useful art
with great impact". For him, it was a symbol of the intellectual activity
and maturity necessary for a nation's march towards excellence. Zniber notes
that "authentic" criticism aims to discover how well the literary
work under study achieves the mission and purpose set forth by the writer. To
show that, el Gharbaoui believes that critics must display strong potential:
extensive knowledge, strong character, genuine expertise, superb craftsmanship
and a great taste in history, not to mention local and global languages and
literature. Like El Gharbaoui and Bentabet, Zniber considers this hobbyist
broader knowledge essential for critical judgment, encouraging critics to
embrace creative freedom beyond "error writing methods time", to
bring clarity to critical language as well as to clarify and justify before
important concepts are advocated or used. Though ephemeral, these statements by
Zniber and others are only excerpts cited by Kharmach to explain how the
"critics" of the 1940s and early 1950s viewed critical activism.
Brief Biography of Tahar Ben
Jelloun
Tahar Ben
Jelloun was born in Fez, Morocco. The family - consisting of four children,
three boys and a girl - lived in a small apartment in the Medina, the medieval
old town of Morocco's most beautiful city. His father, a low-ranking merchant,
sold spices in a small market shop and later worked as a seamstress, making
djellabas (a long, loose robe worn by Arab men).
At the age of 5, Ben Jelloun
enrolled in a Koran school, where he learned to memorize and recite verses from
the Koran. Two years later, he entered a Franco-Arabic school, learning French
in the morning (this was his first exposure to the language) and Arabic in the
afternoon. He is a diligent and serious student. He later studied philosophy at
Rabat University. In 1971, at the age of 26, Ben Jelloun immigrated to France
to complete his studies at the Sorbonne. He then worked for a time in Paris as
a psychotherapist. His first novel, Harrouda, was published in 1973. Since
then, he has written nine novels, as well as several collections of short
stories, poems, and essays. He is perhaps best known for his trilogy of novels
about the life of Ahmed/Zahra, a girl whose father, longing for a male heir,
raised her as a boy: L'Enfant des Sables, a bestseller in France; Sacred Night;
and the recently released The Wrong Night.
Taher Ben Jelloun is the most
prolific and controversial contemporary Moroccan writer. Jelloun is one of the
most famous French writers: his most recent book, Explaining Racism to My
Daughter, is a bestseller; and in 1987 he received the Goncourt Prize for his
novel La Nuit Sacrée, the first book by an Arab writer to be so
honoured. Over the past two years, he has been shortlisted for the Nobel Prize
in Literature. Goncourt Prize winner Ben Jelloun has been accused of
"beautifying his Moroccan themes to please the whims of Western
readers" (El Guabli, 2016, P. 62). In 2001, he published This Blinding
Absence of Light, a semi-fictional memoir based on Aziz Bine bine's
experiences in the secret
Tazmamart prison after the Skhirat
coup; followed by an English translation by Linda Cloverdale titled The Absence
of This Glare, which, in 2002, won the prestigious IMPAC award in 2004. He was
heavily attacked for stealing BineBine's story. He also lacks credibility as a
human rights defender in Morocco as he is also accused of failing to use his
prominent literary status to pressure King Hassan II to release his victims of
Tazmamart, who were detained for another 4 years. (El Guabli, 2016, P. 63).
Theoretical Framework
Psychoanalytic theory holds that
resistance and defence mechanisms prevent unconscious and unpleasant thoughts
and emotions from becoming conscious. Psychoanalytic articles explain how pain
prevents the satisfaction of addictions and sexual needs as well as the proper
dissipation of aggressive feelings. The blocked expression of these needs leads
to inner turmoil. For Freud, therefore, the central premise is that we are
driven by unconscious desires of which we are not aware and that this lack of
awareness leads to motivated or self-destructive behaviour. self. Freud
believed that we deceive ourselves about the reasons for our behaviour and that
this self-delusion limits our choices. By becoming aware of our unconscious
desires and our defences against them, we increase the choices available to us.
Therefore, when we reduce our level of being motivated by unconscious factors,
we gain a higher degree of self-control.
However, this paper borrows eclectic
concepts from interdisciplinary studies; Erving's concept of Goffman's
"holistic institution", Elaine Scarry's comprehensive and detailed
theoretical definition and analysis of torture, and Judith Herman's study of
trauma.
Critical Analysis of This Blinding Absence of Light
Tahar Ben Jelloun tells the story of
political prisoners who took part in the failed coup against King Hassan II of
Morocco in 1971. Jelloun's prose is superb; the book is a tribute to the human
spirit capable of surviving in the most inhumane conditions. This story is
based on true events and the author's interview with a former prisoner Aziz
Binebine.
After the attempt to overthrow the
king, sixty people were held for eighteen years in a secret prison called
Tazmamart, located in the Sahara Desert. Conditions in this prison were
horrible and brutal. The prisoners were buried alive, kept in complete darkness
in an underground cell 5 feet high and 9 feet long, where they could neither
get up nor sit down; scorpions and other insects occupied the prisoners' cells,
with one small hole for air and another in the floor used as a toilet. They
only get enough food to last until the next day. The only time they were
allowed out was to bury other prisoners.
Salim, the main character, finds
strength and meaning in religion, Islam. Although he was not religious before
being detained, he also refused to hate those who put him in these conditions.
Most people die not from hunger but from hatred. The feeling of hate reduces
you; it eats you from the inside and attacks the immune system. When we have
hatred within us, it always crushes us.
Monarchy and Politics of Detention in This Blinding Absence of Light
A Monarch is a form of government in
which a person, the monarch, is head of a state for life or until abdication.
Until the 20th century, the most common form of government was
monarchy.
Half a century ago, Samuel P.
Huntington (1968), when discussing regime transformations from autocracy to
democracy, took the view that an absolute monarch who considered reaching a
compromise, using which he or she would retain some of his or her powers within
the framework of a democratic system, was likely to get disappointed. In the
long run, the monarch faced a zero-sum game; either try to retain his or her
powers as an absolute monarch or be stripped of all powers and, at best,
continue as a ceremonial head of state of a democracy. The basic logic behind
this statement is simple: a leader who has not been elected by the people has
little or no legitimacy to rule in a democratic polity.
At the same time, monarchies are not
on the verge of extinction; currently, there are approximately 30 democracies
with a monarch as head of state and among authoritarian regimes, monarchies, in
particular, are very stable (e.g. Kailitz, 2013; Magaloni, 2008). Yet, the
question of how much power monarchs possess has not aroused a great deal of
interest among political scientists. Whereas, the relationship between
presidents and prime ministers has been widely discussed in the literature on
semi-presidentialism (e.g. Åberg & Sedelius, 2018; Brunlíc & Kubát,
2019; Cheibub et al., 2010; Duverger, 1980; Elgie, 1999; Sartori, 1997;
Schleiter & Morgan-Jones, 2009), the issue of executive power sharing in
democratic monarchies has been more or less completely neglected.
Political writers in prison are
"trauma writers whose work is marked by the primary function of
witnessing" (Livescu, 2013, P. 221). Inmates
have been documenting their incarceration experiences since the prison's
existence. Paul Gready argues that being a political prisoner means being
"written with diversity" and "being challenged in writing"
((Livescu, 2013, P. 489). In her torture structure, Elaine Scarry admits that
the pain caused is objectified, denied as a personal pain, and read as fiction
about state power ((Livescu, 2013, P. 28). Memoirs from a political prison help
former prisoners rebuild the past and "restore [destroyed] voices" ((Livescu,
2013, P. 50). Moreover, they give meaning to the time of incarceration; a
period that creates a gap in the personal history of political prisoners. The
article contradicts the view that the incarceration experience destroys the
world of prisoners and does not help them form a real world, because it helps
them reintegrate as political citizens.
Resistance and survival are the most
important themes of political prison stories because, for political prisoners,
resistance is survival. Conscientious prisoners of conscience explore inhumane
prison conditions and preserve the experiences of their fellow prisoners in
collective memory so that their sacrifices are not in vain; Political stories
about prisons are "proof of the ultimate victory of truth over power"
(Chergui 2014. P. 38).
Political prisoners associate
writing with their quest for freedom. This paper therefore aims to compare the
representations of torture, body and voice in This Blinding Absence of Light
(2002) by Taher Ben Jelloun. King Hassan II drafted Morocco's first
constitution in 1962, allowing him to manipulate and oversee both the
government and parliament. Political parties now encourage strikes and
demonstrations to achieve democracy. Morocco was then experiencing a
"bloody war between the monarchy and the left-wing political parties"
since King Hassan II used violence and "oppression to stifle all
dissenting voices". (Elaissi,1976, P. 658).
The 1970s began in Morocco with two
successive failed coups led by General Maḏbūḥ in 1971 and Muḥammad Oufkir in
1972. The coup leaders were publicly executed and used as a scene. Symbols of
those who dare to challenge the monarchy; the soldiers involved in coups,
whether intentional or not, are taken to Tazmamart, a notorious prison camp in
Morocco.
In addition, the early 1970s saw
many protests by students and opposition groups, including the ʾIla al-ʾmām led
by Abraham Sirfāty, Li-naḫdim al-shʿb and the 23 March movement led by Abraham
Sirfāty. Muḥammad Karfāty leader; members of these leftist groups have been
arrested, tortured, mutilated, missing, and persecuted for many years. Although
they claim an equal and democratic Moroccan society, they are accused of being
a threat to national security. Susan Slymovics in her article "Argument
from Silence: "The Truth Commission of Morocco and Female Political
Prisoners," stated that "the death of King Hassan II on July 23, 1999
was a turning point [...] In 1990, King Hassan II established the Council of
Justices. Human Rights issues [. . .] were modelled after a similar French
institution, to restore the regime's repressive reputation: these efforts
intensified after the death of the king" (Elaissi,1976, P. 88).
On January 7, 2004, King Muḥammad VI
established Hayʼat al-ʾInṣāf wa al-Muṣalaḥa (Equity and Reconciliation
Commission (ERC)) to investigate past widespread human rights abuses. Of the 58
people who were secretly held in Tazmamart, only 28 survived and were able to
tell their stories. Fifty-eight detainees were divided into two groups of 29
each and divided into two cells; cell A and cell B. Only three prisoners
survived in cell B where Ben Jelloun's prisoner was kept. This Blinding
Absence of Light (2002) takes place before the order to evacuate Tazmamart
in 1991, the prisoners lived for 18 years during which they "were given
the same daily ration of dry bread and diluted coffee, heard the same stories
and share their conflicts and fight for their freedom." Their families and
the outside world know where they are" (Sellman, 1990, P. 71).
International attention to the
notorious Tazmamart prison and the tombs surrounding it has led to articles
about Tazmamart, described as "individually, collectively and
nationally", well known in Morocco and around the world.
The first coup took place on 10 July
1971, when King Hassan II celebrated his 42nd birthday at the Skhirat Palace in
the presence of Morocco's most prominent men, including entrepreneurs, artists,
soldiers and diplomats. General Muḥammed Maḏbūḥ and Colonel Muḥammed ̒ Ababū
planned to overthrow King Hassan II from power; they tricked the cadets of the
Ahermoumou military academy into telling them that the king's life was in
danger and ordered to shoot anyone who resisted. Over a thousand inexperienced
practitioners find themselves caught up in a deadly shootout between
practitioners who believe the king's life is in danger and the palace guards
who are protecting the king from the attack of the students. Miraculously, the
king escaped certain death and within a few hours everything was under control.
The second coup took place on August 16, 1972, when King Hassan II returned
from France. Several army jet fighters attacked the king's plane, but the pilot
landed safely and the king's life was also miraculously saved. The 1972 coup
d'etat was instigated by Morocco's second most important figure, General
Oufkir, who was executed the same evening.
Although he was accused of using
Aziz Binebine's experience to write This Blinding Absence of Light, he
continues to deny it as quoted in David Tresilian's review of This Blinding
Absence of Light by Ben Jelloun in the online weekly Al-Ahram, who said
that the memoir "is Taher's, although it was heavily inspired by me and my
story." In an open letter, Aziz Binebine wrote that Ben Jelloun
"pressured him to speak and reject" the memoir (Lindsey and M. Lynx
Qualey). However, Ben Jelloun insists that Binebine begged him to write his
story (Lewis, 2000, P. 129).
Taher Ben Jelloun's semi-fictional
memoir The Absence of Glare was controversial when it was first published. It
is based on true events, the testimony of a Tazmamart survivor named Aziz
Binebine, who spent eighteen years in the shadows of the notorious Moroccan
prison for taking part in the failed Skhirat coup in 1971. The memoir recounts
the journey of suffering, resistance and survival of a former prisoner named
Salim, which means unharmed in Arabic. It is through the eyes of the
narrator/survivor that the author paints a portrait of eighteen years of
imprisonment. Salim, throughout the memoir, is not only a witness but also a
great storyteller in this dark universe; he helps his teammates through their
pain. This paper presents the daily lives of the undead buried in the tombs of
Tazmamart, their inhuman sufferings, resistance and survival. Tazmamart's
prisoners struggled to survive; some have said, pray, hope and survive.
However, most go mad, lose hope, and die. Ben Jelloun's memoir is characterized
by smooth, emotional storytelling and vivid imagery of anguish, suffering,
hunger, and torture. The structure is neither chronological nor linear. Ben
Jelloun constructs a first-person narrator using the "I" of Tazmamart
survivor, Salim/Aziz Binebine; to represent the collective experience of
Tazmamart victims who have disappeared forever and are not can tell their
stories.
In This Blinding Absence of Light, Salim had no prior knowledge of the
coup planned in Skhirat in 1971. When he first began his detention, he watched
the night the coup took place and where he was stopped, was like the night when
his life stopped and lost all meaning. On July 10, 1970, Salim was removed from
life, with no past or memories. So, to fight behind the prison walls and start
over with his life, he must learn to forget and escape from his past life
outside the prison. Salim recalled that night: on the night of July 10, 1970, I
became ageless. I have grown neither older nor younger. I have lost my age. You
can no longer read it in my face. I am no longer here to give my age a face. I
came to a standstill over in nothingness, where time is abolished, tossed back
to the wind, handed over to that vast beach of white sheet rippling in a light
breeze, given up to the sky drained of its stars, its images, the childhood
dreams that found refuge there, emptied of everything, even God. I crossed over
there to learn forgetfulness, but I never succeeded in being completely within
nothingness, not even in thought. (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 5)
In a very elaborate style, This
Blinding Absence of Light recreates the deeply personal suffering of a man
who has moved from a state of humanity to a state of emptiness, deprived of
life and death, yet he is still dependent on his mental and spiritual abilities
to survive the harsh conditions of Tazmamart and find solace in his spiritual
meditation, isolation and ignorance of his painful past. Salim realizes that
his survival depends largely on his ability to renounce the sounds, colours and
desires of life, avoiding thinking about the injustice of being held captive
for a crime he didn't commit. Furthermore, he realized that he shouldn't let
emotions like hope, hate, love, and passion enter his cell, and as such
emotions would waste his resistance efforts.
Poignantly written, this Blinding
Absence of Light illustrates that Tazmamart's prisoners are devastated mentally
and physically, but their dignity is what remains in the face of persecution.
Guards were ordered to beat prisoners by destroying their dignity. However,
Salim is aware of the importance of preserving one's dignity to survive,
because "keeping one's dignity is essential" (Ben Jelloun 1944, P. 123).
Inmates were brought from the Kenitra civilian prison to Tazmamart, blindfolded
with black cloth and handcuffed. They were deprived of their property and
cursed. Prisoners are now just numbers, the police replace their names with
numbers. The prisoners insisted on calling each other by name and this was
their first and main mechanism of protest to preserve dignity.
Salim's resentment towards the
father who betrayed his son and abandoned his wife runs throughout the story.
Salim's father and mother are completely different characters. Gender roles are
reversed because "the masculinization of the mother is associated with the
feminization of the father" (El Guabli, 2016, P. 75). When Salim's father,
King Hassan II's jester, realized that his son was among the rebels seeking to
kill his master, he condemned his son as dead and organized a symbolic funeral
for him. This strange reaction from Salim's father shows how willing he was to
give up his masculinity to fully submit to the will of the king; His father,
described as "the dapper of Marrakech and the charmer of Don
Juanesque" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 25), feels no responsibility for his
many children and is concerned only with the quality of his perfume and its
accessories. On the contrary, her mother put femininity aside, playing the role
of a father and shouldering the responsibility of raising children. Everyone's
will to resist is different. Salim understood this fact well because he said:
"Not all of us have the same need or will to resist" (Ben Jelloun,
1944, P. 61), and see resistance "as a duty, not an obligation" (Ben
Jelloun, 1944, P. 23). The subjectivity of prisoners is reflected in their
resistance mechanism and tendency to preserve their identity. Yenna Wu found
that inmates' survival strategies varied according to their educational and
social environments as well as their personalities ("Recovering muted voices"
32). As for Salim, he learned of his mother's resistance: I am only a man, like
all others, with the will not to give in. That's all. A will that is firm,
ruthless and uncompromising. Where does it come from? From a long way back.
From childhood. From my mother, whom I always saw struggling to raise my
brothers and sisters and me. Never give up. Never flagging for an instant. (Ben
Jelloun, 1944, P. 23).
Silence is the objective correlation
of death; Paradoxically, silence is a form of torture and a protest mechanism.
When we hear the word Muqāwama (resistance), we immediately think of something
full of action and movement or all kinds of violence and protest. In reality,
however, silence can turn into an act of protest. Salim describes the types of
silence he experiences behind the high walls of Tazmamart: the silence of
night. It was necessary for us. The silence of the companion who was slowly
leaving us. The silence we observed was a sign of mourning. The silence of
blood circulating sluggishly. The silence told us where the scorpions were. The
silence of images we ran and reran through our minds. The silence of the guards
expressed weariness and routine. The silence of the shadow of memories burned
to ashes. The silence of a leaden sky from which almost no sign could reach us.
The silence of absence, the blinding absence of life. The hardest, most
unbearable silence was that of light. A powerful and manifold silence. There
was the silence of the night, always the same, and then there were the silences
of light. A long and endless absence.
(Ben Jelloun 1944, P. 51).
From the outset, Salim, a
non-religious Muslim, claimed to have "searched for the black stone that
purifies the soul from death" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 1). The most
important survival strategy that revolved around the prisoners' daily lives was
their religious faith. Their imprisonment in underground cells like tombs and
the breath of death that attacked them daily through the death of one of them
led to their religious faith. Every prisoner feels that he is going to die. In
other words, throughout Ben Jelloun's semi-fictional memoir, any prisoner could
die at any moment, so they must be ready to meet Allah. So in This Blinding
Absence of Light, there are many references to the black stone found in
Ka'aba.
Liscano writes: "In torture,
one wants to die, the other begs the executioner to kill. The executioner said,
'You want us to kill you. But we won't do that'" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 48).
Taher Ben Jelloun uses photographic techniques to present discrete death
scenes. The prisoners were not allowed to see sunlight, except if one of the
prisoners died. They were allowed to see sunlight while burying one of their
roommates. So death has an opposite meaning as it gives them happiness when
they tell one of their companions to leave forever. Hamid, number 12, was the
first prisoner whose soul left Tazmamart; he lost his mind, isolated himself
and begged for death, which "came to him as he fell into a trance and
banged his head against the wall repeatedly. He let out a long cry; then the
voice and his breathing ceased forever" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 9). Salim
made Driss chew on bread and then gave him small pieces, then took a sip of
water but he refused to eat anything that "his withered legs wrapped
around and pressed against her chest". and he becomes "a strange
little object so disfigured by disease that there is nothing human about
him" (Ben Jelloun 1944, P. 11-12).
"Baba, Saharawi, who joined our
group one evening, was accused of saying that Sahara is not Moroccan,"
says Salim, "died of the cold" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 31). Poor Larbi
went on a hunger strike before he died and became extremely thin,
"bloodshot eyes bulging out of their sockets and foaming at the corners of
his mouth. On his bony face you could read it all, "hate and suffering in
the world." (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 36). Rushdie, badly wounded, died of an
incurable disease of hate. He lost his mind and surrendered; all he wants is
"to slaughter everyone": guards, judges, lawyers, royalty, all who
were behind his detention" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 39). Mustapha, number 8,
was "stung by a scorpion" so the whole scorpion gathered on his
rotting body (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 55-56). "Moh went crazy. When it was
time to eat, instead of eating, he thought of his mother, talked to her, and
imagined he fed her, so "he had no strength, no voice. He was letting
himself die" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 60). Abdelkader let himself die and
committed suicide by swallowing something sharp after Salim stopped telling
stories due to "Salim's physical and mental decline" (Ben Jelloun,
1944, P. 75-77). Majid, number 6, hanged himself. Salim said: "He tied his
clothes into a rope, wrapped it around his neck, tightened his grip with all
his might, tied the tail of his shirt to the ventilation mesh and lay on the
ground pushing his legs leaning against the door until he choked" (Ben
Jelloun, 1944, P. 92).
Furthermore, the memoir traces the
grotesque images of death overshadowing Tazmamort6, to use Ahmed Marzouki's
pun. Ironically, Bourras died of constipation and could not "push
out" so he was "hard as concrete" so he "perforated the
rectum" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 97-98). Sebban, who joined the inmates in
the early 1980s, died of gangrene that spread rapidly throughout his body.
"I saw worms coming out of the soles of his feet," recalls Salim,
"[there were] so many cockroaches that it was difficult to get rid of
them" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 119). Unable to see what he was eating,
Abdelmalek was "poisoned by a thousand cockroach eggs" because there
were too many cockroaches "laying eggs among the breadcrumbs" (Ben
Jelloun, 1944, P.136). While Abdullah died from constant diarrhoea, Fellah
"died after excruciating pain" from being unable to urinate anymore (Ben
Jelloun, 1944, P. 155). Mohammed and Icho died after a long "disease that
made them cough until they choked" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 162). The
prisoners at Tazmamart understood that death was the only saviour that could
end their ordeal.
Unlike the other prisoners, Salim
resists nothingness and death by suppressing his memories; he stated: "It
took me a while to realize that the enemy is memory. Whoever recalls his past
dies immediately" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 17).
Salim is aware of the importance of
maintaining his sanity in the face of the absurdity of the prison system.
Therefore, he understands that he must develop "personal mental
hygiene" (Livescu, 2011, P. 192). Simona Livescu asserts, "Inner
discipline and a daily dose of good art," "represents the formula for
building mental strength and practising them continuously is the indomitable
secret to maintaining mental survival." psychologically and
physically" (Livescu, 2011, P. 195). Salim mainly relies on his literary
memory to survive and help his fellow prisoners survive their traumatic
experiences. During Salim's childhood, his father loved books and often read
poetry and stories. Salim thus grew up with a rich literary memory. Salim
recited Camus's L'Étranger and Baudelaire's Les Fleurs du Mal.
He, also, fabricated tales from The Arabian Nights since his fellow
inmates had begged him to narrate stories from ʾAlf Līlah wa Līlah (The
Arabian Nights) though he had not read it before. Salim uses storytelling
as a strategy of survival and relief for himself as well as his fellow
prisoners.
Brahim El Guabli asserts that
"Ben Jelloun's work is 'deeply imbued with his Moroccan cultural and
linguistic heritage' (EI Guabli, 2016, P. 79). The
story begins with Salim emphasizing the importance of the Black Stone to his
spiritual survival journey. Furthermore, "the novel hints at similarities
between the story of the king in the novel and King Shahrayār" (EI Guabli,
2016, P. 79). The unfaithfulness of King Shahrayār's wife caused him to take
revenge on all the maidens; the treachery of the rulers and soldiers of King
Hassan II resulted in him serving a prison sentence full of hatred towards the
soldiers. Sheherazade's stories helped her survive and put an end to King
Shahrayār's murder of young women. Similarly, Salim's father used storytelling
to accept the king's mistreatment of his people, and Salim used scripting to
survive in the abyss of Tazmamart (EI Guabli, 2016, P. 79).
"How do you
feel about the army?"
"I don't feel
anything."
"Any
resentment, desire for revenge?"
"No."
"What do you
think of your family?"
"Family's
family"
"What do you think
of your father?"
"He's someone
who loves his children, but he isn't a father."
"Do you resent
him?"
"No, not at
all."
"What will you
do when you leave here?"
"No idea.
Perhaps take care of my health."
(Ben Jelloun 182)
In This Blinding Absent of
Light, Kmandar, the prison director, and his guards are presented in the
memoir as tools at the hands of King Hassan II's dictatorship; their ultimate
goal is to crush the will and identity of the prisoner. Guards do not have
"full authority over" prisoners, but they do have "on their
books a list of abuses to inflict upon prisoners whenever they see fit" (Ben
Jelloun, 1944, P. 15). The Chinese forms of punishment and torture applied in
Mao's Laogai (forced labour camp) were also brutally applied in Moroccan
prisons (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P.86). Kmandar's
personality illustrates how brutal he is and reflects the violence that swept
through Morocco during this period:
He was born to serve, to carry out
all assignments, from the most ordinary to the most monstrous of tasks and
without any doubts. He received orders and implemented them with a metallic
firmness. Before being put in charge of us, he had already slit the throats of
several wretches, buried others alive, and tortured opponents of the regime
with the application of a specialist. He had lost an eye in a car accident. It
was God's will, he said. That's all. (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 45).
Additionally, Salim describes the
two particularly mean guards: Fantass and Hamidouche. Fantasy was a nasty,
bad-tempered man who used to speak using only vulgar, insulting words. Oddly,
he returned after a two-month disappearance, wept and asked the prisoners to
forgive him: I hated you because I'd been taught to hate. I hoped you'd die
slow, painful deaths. I deserve to go to hell for the evil I did to you. God
has punished me! He just snatched away my two grown children and killed them
instantly in a brand-new car. [. . .] I have nothing more to do here below. [.
. .] It's all over for me. Help me to go by forgiving me! (Ben Jelloun, 1944,
P. 45).
Fantass's previous confession,
before he died of a hunger strike, directly takes us to Carlos Liscano's three
questions about the perpetrators' life outside prison walls, namely "When
they go home, what do they tell their wives, their girlfriends, children,
parents, and friends? [. . .] Where does he come from? How does an individual
become that?" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 70-71). "The torturer is as
oneself," argues Liscano, "speaks the same language, and shares the
same values and prejudices" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, 70-71).
Therefore, it is difficult to
understand how an individual can torture another for no reason, how the
executioner, with his bloody hands, can continue his social life with family
and friends, and how the executioner can get rid of the guilt and overcome it. Fear
of the consequences of his atrocities and how the executioner can live and
reconcile his two opposing personalities: wickedness inside the prison and
outside the ordinary. It is terrible that if these executioners were human
beings like all of us, we could one day become torturers because "human
beings are capable of doing absolute evil, ability to hurt others for
satisfaction, to be able to let people die in pain" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P.
72). Therefore, they believe that they are eliminating and exhausting those who
are seen as harmful to society and a threat to the stability of society.
Carlos Liscano asserts that there
are guards who carry out "order after order, it doesn't matter to them.
They are not responsible; it is their superiors who make them villains" (Ben
Jelloun, 1944, P. 71). This Blinding Absence of Light represents a
serious survival strategy that occurs in a variety of cultural and political
contexts, namely dark humour, laughter, and lightness of heart. This survival
tactic helps Tazmamart's prisoners to become human under duress and exact
revenge on their torturers.
In her article, A Life Without
Object(s), Liscano argues that irony and dark humour are key tactics for
accessing the "free world" and staying strong; prisoners laugh at
everything, even at themselves and their illness (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 12).
Tazmamart's prisoners understood the absurd side of their detention and laughed
at their attackers. "Laugh. We try to laugh when we tell old jokes,"
says Salim, "Our cheerfulness is often forced, a kind of nervous
stuttering" (Ben Jelloun 61). Mustapha tells them "pun intended, joke
and give people nicknames."( Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 61 ) Salim recounted a
revelation in which a dog "was sentenced to 5 years in prison! [. . .], It
seems to have bitten a general who came to inspect the barracks near the
prison" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 61). Although this episode is more
ridiculous than the comic, it makes them laugh and decide to choose a name for
their new companion; some wanted to name the dog after Kmandar, the warden, but
ended up calling it Ditto. The poor dog "went crazy, probably from
rabies" and died of hunger and exhaustion (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 62).
Indeed, this episode reveals the mental incompetence of the prison
administrators.
During prolonged confinement and
isolation, Salim "was able to develop ecstasy normally found only in
extremely susceptible people to hypnosis, including the ability to form
positive and negative hallucinations" (Herman, 1967, P. 88). Salim
describes his hallucinations as mainly used to combat loneliness; many of his
hallucinations are about spirituality. Sometimes in the night, he saw a woman
giving him back; he listened to her and followed her "on a pilgrimage
around the seven saints of Marrakech, guardian spirits of the survivors, the
poor and the dead" (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 100).
Salim experiences ecstasy even in
his most desperate moments when he realizes that convincing himself that he is
"out of the world" is the first step to surviving the dark abyss of
Tazmamart (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 50). He decided to start a new life and
replace his memories with new ones because he was "born and died on July
10, 1971"; the date of detention (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 19). Resistance
behind prison walls for those held for very long periods, as in the case of
Tazmamart, is fueled by inmates' decisions to face the timelessness of their
incarceration.
It should be noted that when
detainees were transferred from the Kenitra civilian prison to Tazmamart, they
were not informed of the length of their sentences. Tazmamart's atmosphere led
inmates to conclude that their detention would be long and that it was part of
their agony before death. The complete absence of light and darkness where the
detainees lived made it difficult for them to distinguish day from night.
Karim, prisoner number 15, is obsessed with time. It had the magical ability to
tell the time within one minute, so it became the prisoner's calendar and their
"link to life" outside the prison walls (Ben Jelloun, 1944, P. 28).
The ability to tell time and know it was Karim's survival strategy and of
course, he was involved in the common life of other prisoners like Salim. This
does not contradict the view that "time" in the novel is subjective
and is not governed by hours and minutes because its concept and definition
differ between prisoners. Perceptions of time vary according to the
circumstances of the same person.
Helpless prisoners invent a language
that their roommates can simply understand to safely express their secret
feelings. Offline transcription includes Quran reading, story, dream
interpretation, etc. In Tazmamart, Gharbi used to read verses from the Quran.
Salim is the storyteller and the stories he tells motivate other prisoners to
resist. Like Abdelkader, who pushed Salim to tell the story so as not to die?
Salim told his fellow prisoners’ stories, poems and movies.
Conclusion
This Blinding Absent of Light by
Tahar Ben Jelloun highlighted a dozen decades of unhealthy civilization monarch
system against the Western popular system of democracy as an institution of
governance. The majority of Arab North Africans are Muslims, therefore, they
are guided by Islamic teachings and traditions as an institution of seeking any
interpretation about their life and afterlife endeavours.
Ben Jelloun attempts to tell a story
about King Hassan's brutality as a sign of running away from Islamic thought
and its teachings. Contemporary systems of monarchy have been adulterated with
much harsh enslavement against their subjects for the sake of religion to
continue for life as leaders without any objection from any angle or group of
society.
Moroccans never consider themselves
Africans in practices but Arab-Franco, therefore, this reason makes Moroccan
literature especially not accessible to other regions of Africa. The majority
of their themes are locally composed without any ingredients from other
traditions of Africa. Moroccans'
literary works of art are not known to the majority part of Africa due to
medium of communication barriers. To break this deadlock Moroccan literary
communities must intensify efforts to get more readerships worldwide by
indulging in writing not only for Moroccans but international community.
Some parts of Morocco, especially
the Western part of the country are still claiming or declaring political
independence for themselves and it was supported by foreign allies like Spain.
Morocco's monarch has already withdrawn her membership from the African Union
for over a decade because it failed to comply with many treaties about human
rights violations against citizenries. Writers like Ben Jelloun try to rewrite
Moroccan African and international reputation but its monarchical system of
government will not allow them to accept plain truth though they are living
relatively peacefully society lacks freedom of expression.
Bibliography
Allen, Roger. 2007.
“Rewriting Literary History: The Case of the Arabic Novel” Journal of Arabic Literature, Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 247-260.
Berrada, Mohamed.
1986. Lu’bat anisyane. Rabat. Dar Al
Aman.
Choukri, Mohamed.
1982. Al Khubz Al-hafi. London. Dar
Al Saqi.
Chraibi, Driss. 1954. Le passé simple. Paris. Denoel.
Dobie, Madeleine.
2003. “Francophone Studies and the Linguistic Diversity of the Maghreb” in
Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East. 23,
1 &2. Pp. 32-40.
Kaye, Jacqueline and
Zoubir, Abdelhamid. 1992. The Ambiguous
Compromise: Language, Literature and National Identity in Algeria and Morocco.
London. Routledge. 1990.
Kilito, Abdelfattah.
2013. Atakalamu Jamee’ Alughat laken
belarabia (Je parle toutes les langues main en arabe). Translated from
French by Abdesalam Benabd Alali. Casablanca. DarToubkal.
Khatibi. Abdelkebir.
1968. Le Roman maghrébin. Paris.
Maspéro.
Laabi, Abdellatif.
1969. l’oeil et la nuit. Paris.
Grasset.
Laroui, Abdellah.
1967. L’Idéologie arabe contemporaine.
Paris. La Découverte.
Orlando, Valerie.
2009. Francophone Voices of the ‘New
Morocco’ in Film and Print: (Re) presenting a Society in Transition.
London. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Parrilla Fernandez,
Gonzalo. 2006. La literatura marroquí
contemporánea. La novela y la crítica
literaria. Cuenca, Eds. de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.
Said, Edward. 2004.
“Living in Arabic” in Al Ahram Weekly.
12 - 18 February. Issue No. 677
Wolf, Mary Ellen.
1992. “Textual Politics in Contemporary Moroccan Francophone Literature” The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language
Association, Vol. 25, No. 1, Oppositional Discourse (Spring), pp. 32-40.
Abu-Bakr, Randa.
"The Political Prisoner as Antihero: The Prison Poetry of Wole Soyinka and
ʾAhmad Fuʾad Nigm." Comparative
Literature Studies, vol. 46, no. 2, 2009, pp. 261-286.
Ben Jelloun, Taher. This Blinding Absence of Light. Trans.
Linda Coverdale. The New Press, 2002.
Chergui, Azeddine.
"The Poetics of Resistance and Memory in Moroccan Pison Writings"
Langues et Littératures, vol. xxv, 2016, pp. 37-57.
Debray, Régis. Revolution in the Revolution? Armed Struggle
and Political Struggle in Latin America. Translated by Bobbye Ortiz.
Penguin Books Ltd, 1968.
Di Stefano, Eugenio.
"Remembering Pain in Uruguay." Human Rights, Suffering and Aesthetics in Political Prison Literature, edited by
Yenna Wu and Simona Livescu. Lexington Books, 2011, pp.163-184.
Dove, Patrick.
"The Spoken Animal: Politics, Language and History in Carlos Liscano's
Truck of Fools." A Journal on Social
History and Literature in Latin America, vol.5, no.1, Fall 2007, pp. 236-242.
Duncan, Marca Grace.
"'Cradled on the Sea:' Positive Images of Prison and Theories of Punishment."
California Law Review, vol.76 no.6,
1988, pp. 1201-1247.
Elaissi, Hanane.
"The Rise of Feminist Consciousness in Morocco during the Lead
Years". International Journal of
Education and Research, vol.3, no.2, 2015, pp. 651-666.
El Guabli, Brahim.
"The 'Hidden Transcript' of Resistance in Moroccan Tazmamart Prison
Writings. The Arab Studies Journal,
vol. 22, no.1, 2014, pp. 170–207.
Goffman, Erving. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of
Mental Patients and Other Inmates.
Doubleday Co., 1961.
Gready, Paul.
"Autobiography and the power of writing: Political Prison Writing in the Apartheid
Era." Journal of Southern African
Studies, vol, 19, no.3, 1993, pp. 498-523.
Hampsten, Elizabeth.
"Translator's Note." Truck of
Fools by Carlos Liscano and translated by Elizabeth Hampsten. Vanderbilt
University Press, 2004, pp. vii-x.
Harlow, Barbara. Resistance and Literature. Methuen,
1987.
Hart, Janet.
"Tales from the Walled City: Aesthetics of Political Prison Culture in
Post-War Greece." Society and
History, vol. 41, no.3, 1999, pp. 482-509
Herman, Judith Lewis. Trauma and Recovery. Basic Books, 1992.
Johansson, Maria
Teresa. " Desafección, duelo y carácter indeleble en el testimonio El
furgón de los locos de Carlos Liscano." Taller de Letras, no. 62, 2018, pp. 9-24.
Lewis, Mary Anne. The Maghreb Goes Abroad: The
"Worlding" of Postcolonial North African Francophone Literature and
Film in Global Market. PhD dissertation, Yale University, 2013.
Tresilian, David. “This
Blinding Absence of Light.” Al-Ahram
Weekly Online. April 12-18, 2001.
http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/Archive/2001/529/bo6.htm. Accessed May 21, 2018.
Wilson, Major Carlos. The Tupamaros: The Unmentionables.
Braden, 1974.
Wu, Yenna.
"Introduction." Human Rights,
Suffering and Aesthetics in Political Prison Literature, edited by Yenna Wu
and Simona Livescu. Lexington Books, 2011, pp.1-16.
No comments:
Post a Comment
ENGLISH: You are warmly invited to share your comments or ask questions regarding this post or related topics of interest. Your feedback serves as evidence of your appreciation for our hard work and ongoing efforts to sustain this extensive and informative blog. We value your input and engagement.
HAUSA: Kuna iya rubuto mana tsokaci ko tambayoyi a ƙasa. Tsokacinku game da abubuwan da muke ɗorawa shi zai tabbatar mana cewa mutane suna amfana da wannan ƙoƙari da muke yi na tattaro muku ɗimbin ilimummuka a wannan kafar intanet.